Semantic UI vs Ant Design

When it comes to choosing a CSS framework for a web development project, developers are often met with an array of options, each with its unique features and community support. Among these, Semantic UI and Ant Design have emerged as popular choices for developers who prioritize user interface design and experience. In this comprehensive article, we will delve into the intricacies of Semantic UI and Ant Design, comparing their features, ease of use, customization capabilities, and much more.

Introduction to Semantic UI

Semantic UI is an open-source framework that leverages human-friendly HTML for its design philosophy, focusing on semantics and meaningful markup. With a tagline of “UI is the vocabulary of the web,” Semantic UI aims to create a shared vocabulary for UI.

Homepage: Semantic UI
Documentation: Semantic UI Docs
Installation: Semantic UI Installation

Popular third-party addons or libraries for Semantic UI include:

Semantic UI Code Sample

<link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="semantic.min.css">
<script src="semantic.min.js"></script>

<div class="ui menu">
  <div class="header item">Brand</div>
  <a class="active item">Home</a>
  <a class="item">About</a>
  <a class="item">Contact</a>

Introduction to Ant Design

Ant Design, often referred to as AntD, is a design system for enterprise-level products. It is built upon the values of Ant Design System and provides a high-quality set of React UI components out-of-the-box. Ant Design is widely recognized for its design language and React UI library that focuses on the quality and experience of enterprise applications.

Homepage: Ant Design
Documentation: Ant Design Docs
Installation: Ant Design Installation

Popular third-party addons or libraries for Ant Design include:

Ant Design Code Sample

import { Menu } from 'antd';
import React from 'react';
import 'antd/dist/antd.css';

const { Item } = Menu;

export default function App() {
  return (
    <Menu mode="horizontal">
      <Item key="brand">Brand</Item>
      <Item key="home">Home</Item>
      <Item key="about">About</Item>
      <Item key="contact">Contact</Item>

Feature Comparison

When evaluating Semantic UI and Ant Design, it’s crucial to compare their features to determine which framework best suits your project needs.

Design Philosophy

Semantic UI focuses on using human-friendly HTML and strives to make the code self-explanatory. It’s designed with a natural language approach that aims to make the code readable and maintainable.

Ant Design, on the other hand, is built with a set of high-quality React components and follows a design language that caters to enterprise applications. It emphasizes consistency, efficiency, and usability, making it a go-to choice for complex projects.

Component Library

Semantic UI offers a wide range of components that are flexible and customizable. The components include elements like buttons, dividers, loaders, and collections such as breadcrumbs, forms, and tables.

Ant Design provides a comprehensive library of components that are specifically tailored for enterprise applications. The components are built with React and include advanced elements like date pickers, dropdowns, pagination, and many more that are essential for building complex user interfaces.

Customization and Theming

Semantic UI allows for extensive customization through its theming system. It uses LESS as its styling language, which enables developers to build custom themes by modifying variables and overriding styles.

Ant Design also supports customization and theming, with a primary focus on React. It uses LESS for styling as well and provides a set of tools to customize themes, including modifying variables and using the antd-customize-webpack-plugin for advanced customizations.

Browser Compatibility

Both Semantic UI and Ant Design are compatible with modern browsers. Semantic UI supports the latest versions of browsers like Chrome, Firefox, Edge, Safari, and Internet Explorer 11.

Ant Design is also compatible with the latest versions of major browsers and provides support for Internet Explorer 11, although some advanced features may require polyfills for full compatibility.

Community and Support

Semantic UI has a strong community with a large number of contributors on GitHub. It also has a dedicated community forum where developers can seek help and discuss issues related to the framework.

Ant Design boasts a massive community, especially among developers who use React. It has a large number of contributors and an active community on platforms like GitHub, Stack Overflow, and Spectrum.

Conclusion of the First Half

In the first half of this article, we’ve introduced both Semantic UI and Ant Design, delving into their homepages, documentation, installation processes, and popular addons. We’ve also provided code samples for each framework and compared their features, design philosophies, component libraries, customization capabilities, and community support.

In the upcoming second half, we will continue our in-depth comparison by discussing the learning curve, performance, documentation quality, real-world use cases, and the decision-making process for choosing between Semantic UI and Ant Design. Stay tuned for a thorough analysis that will help you make an informed decision for your next project.

[Continue to Second Half…]

Learning Curve

When it comes to the learning curve, both Semantic UI and Ant Design have their own considerations. Semantic UI’s use of human-friendly HTML and natural language principles can make it easier for beginners to understand and use. The framework’s naming conventions are intuitive, which can accelerate the development process for new users.

Ant Design, with its React-based components, might require a steeper learning curve for those not familiar with React. However, for developers experienced with React, Ant Design can be very straightforward to implement. Its comprehensive documentation and examples also aid in learning how to use the framework effectively.


Performance is a critical aspect when choosing a CSS framework, especially for large-scale applications. Semantic UI, with its jQuery dependency and less focus on performance optimization, may not be as efficient as Ant Design in some scenarios. However, for most applications, Semantic UI’s performance is more than adequate.

Ant Design, on the other hand, is designed with performance in mind, especially for enterprise-level applications. The use of React allows for efficient updates and rendering, making it suitable for high-performance applications. Additionally, Ant Design supports server-side rendering, which can further improve performance and SEO.

Documentation Quality

Good documentation is key to the usability of any framework. Semantic UI provides detailed documentation with plenty of examples, making it easier to understand how to use its components. The documentation also includes a theming guide, which is beneficial for developers looking to customize the look and feel of their applications.

Ant Design’s documentation is equally comprehensive, with clear examples and API descriptions for each component. The documentation is available in multiple languages, which is a testament to its global user base. Ant Design also offers design resources and tools, such as design kits for Sketch and Axure, which are valuable for designers working alongside developers.

Real-World Use Cases

Semantic UI is used in a variety of projects, from small personal websites to larger, more complex applications. Its semantic approach makes it a good choice for projects where readability and maintainability are priorities.

Ant Design is typically favored for enterprise applications and large-scale projects due to its focus on standardization and high-quality React components. Companies that use Ant Design include Alibaba, Tencent, and Baidu, which speaks to its reliability and scalability.

Decision-Making Process

Choosing between Semantic UI and Ant Design ultimately comes down to the specific needs of your project and your team’s expertise. Consider the following factors:

  • Project Scope: For smaller projects or those that don’t require a React-based approach, Semantic UI might be more suitable. For larger, enterprise-level applications, Ant Design is often the preferred choice.
  • Development Team: If your team is more comfortable with jQuery and traditional HTML/CSS, Semantic UI could be a better fit. If your team is proficient in React, Ant Design will likely be more beneficial.
  • Performance Needs: For applications where performance is a top priority, Ant Design’s React components and performance optimizations may offer an advantage.
  • Design Requirements: If your project requires a highly customizable UI with a natural language style, Semantic UI’s theming capabilities can be appealing. Ant Design’s design language is more standardized, which can help maintain consistency across large applications.
  • Community and Support: Both frameworks have strong communities, but if you’re looking for more React-focused community support, Ant Design has the edge.


Both Semantic UI and Ant Design are powerful CSS frameworks with their own strengths and ideal use cases. Semantic UI offers an intuitive and human-readable approach to UI design, while Ant Design provides a comprehensive set of React components suited for enterprise-level applications.

As a developer or a team, it’s important to weigh the features, performance, learning curve, and community support of each framework against the requirements of your project. By doing so, you can make an informed decision that aligns with your development goals and leads to the successful implementation of your UI design.

Whether you choose Semantic UI or Ant Design, both frameworks are capable of delivering high-quality user interfaces with rich features and customization options. As the web development landscape continues to evolve, both Semantic UI and Ant Design are likely to adapt and grow, offering even more to developers and designers alike.

Remember to explore the frameworks further through their official documentation and community resources:

By staying informed and experimenting with both options, you can choose the best framework for your project’s unique needs.

More Semantic UI Comparisons


What do you think?